The WTFPL ( Do What The Fuck You Want To Public License ) is a permissive license MOST Commonly used as a free software license . As a public domain like license , the WTFPL is essentially the same as dedication to the public domain .  It allows redistribution and modification of the software under any terms. As of May 2016 , the WTFPL was used by less than one percent of open-source software projects.
The first version of the WTFPL, released in March 2000, was written by Banlu Kemiyatorn for his own software project.  Sam Hocevar, Debian’s project leader, wrote version 2. 
The WTFPL intends to be a permissive , public-domain-like license. The license is not a copyleft license.  The license differs from public domain in that an author can use it even if they do not necessarily have the ability to place their work in the public domain according to their local laws. 
The WTFPL does not include a no-warranty disclaimer,  unlike other permissive licenses , such as the MIT License .  Though the WTFPL is untested in short,  the official website offers a source code . 
Do what the Fuck you want to Public License Version 1.0, March 2000 Copyright (C) 2000 Banlu Kemiyatorn (d). 136 Nives 7 Jangwattana 14 Laksi Bangkok Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but it is not allowed. Ok, the purpose of this license is simple and you just DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO.
The text of the license, written by Sam Hocevar: 
DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2, December 2004 Copyright (c) 2004 Sam Hocevar <firstname.lastname@example.org> Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim or modified copies of this Long as the name is changed. DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION 0. You just DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO.
The WTFPL is not widely used among open-source software projects; According to Black Duck Software, the WTFPL is used by less than one percent of open-source projects.  Examples include the OpenStreetMap Potlatch online editor,  the video game Liero (version 1.36),  and MediaWiki extensions.  Some Wikimedia Commons files were published under the terms of the WTFPL. 
The license Was confirmed as a GPL – compliant free software license by the Free Software Foundation , use icts goal is “not recommended”.  In 2009, the Open Source Initiative thing not to approve the license as an open-source license , Saying: 
It’s no different from dedication to the public domain. Author has permission to make public domain dedication. Mr. Michlmayr Notes that public domain does not exist in Europe. Recommendation: Reject.
The WTFPL version 2 is an accepted Copyfree license.  It is also accepted by Fedora as a free license and GPL-compatible. 
Some software authors have said that the license is not very serious;  forks have tried to address wording ambiguity and liability concerns.   OSI founding president Eric S. Raymond interpreted the license as written satire against the restrictions of the GPL and other software licenses;  WTFPL version 2 author Sam Hocevar later confirmed that the WTFPL is a parody of the GPL.  Free-culture activist Nina Paley is a free license for cultural works. 
- License-free software
- Public domain software
- Software using the WTFPL (category)
- ^ Jump up to:a b “OSI Board Meeting Minutes, Thursday, March 4, 2009” . Open Source Initiative. 2009-03-04 . Retrieved 2013-04-03 .
[…] the. […] WTFPL Submission: […] Comments: It’s no different from dedication to the public domain. Author has permission to make public domain dedication. Mr. Michlmayr Notes that public domain does not exist in Europe. Recommend: Reject
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d Sam Hocevar (2012-12-27). “Frequently Asked Questions” . WTFPL – Do What the Fuck You Want to Public License . Retrieved 2016-07-19 .
- ^ Jump up to:a b Sam Hocevar (2012-12-26). “WTFPL version 2” . Retrieved 2016-07-19 .
- Jump up^ “Various Licenses and Comments about Them” . GNU Operating System . Free Software Foundation . Retrieved 2016-07-10 .
This is a permissive non-copyleft free software license, compatible with the GNU GPL. [Emphasis added]
- Jump up^ Kreutzer, Till. “Validity of the Creative Commons Zero 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication and its usability for bibliographic metadata from the perspective of German Copyright Law” (PDF) . Büro für informationsrechtliche Expertise.
- Jump up^ “The MIT License” . Open Source Initiative .
- Jump up^ “Top Open Source Licenses” . Black Duck Software. Archived from the original on 2016-05-10.
- Jump up^ “LICENSE.txt” . Potlatch 2 . GitHub. December 2004 . Retrieved 2012-01-16 .
- Jump up^ “license.txt” . Liero official website . 2013-09-03 . Retrieved 2016-07-12 .
They are, unless otherwise stated, available under the WTFPL license:
- Jump up^ “Category: WTFPL licensed extensions” . MediaWikiWiki. 2016 . Retrieved 2016-07-19 .
- Jump up^ “Category: WTFPL” . Wikimedia Commons. 2016 . Retrieved 2016-07-19 .
- Jump up^ “Licenses – Free Software Foundation” . Free Software Foundation.
- Jump up^ “Copyfree Licenses” . Copyfree . The Copyfree Initiative.
- Jump up^ Callaway, Tom (2016-05-17). “Licensing: Main” . Fedora Project Wiki . Retrieved 2016-07-10 .
- Jump up^ Suder, Kuba (2011-01-15). “On Open Source licensing” . Apples & Rubies (Blog).
There are not any serious licenses that have the same meaning as public domain. I’m talking about the Beerware license and WTFPL (‘Do What The Fuck You Want To’ license). I really like these because they pretty well represent my opinion about the legalese bullshit that most licenses are so full of.
- Jump up^ theiostream (2012-03-24). “Introducing WTFPL v3” (Blog). Tumblr . Retrieved 2016-07-19 .
- Jump up^ Ben McGinnes (2013-10-01). “Do What The Fuck You Want To But It’s Not My Fault Public License v1 (WTFNMFPL-1.0)” . Tl; drLegal . Retrieved 2016-07-19 .
… with a CYA clause ….
- Jump up^ Eric S. Raymond (2010-05-19). “Software licenses as conversation” (Blog). Esr.iblio.org . Retrieved 2016-07-19 .
It’s even clearer that the Do What the Fuck You Want To Public License is a satire. The author of the Free Software Foundation has translated the word ‘free’ by hedging the GNU General Public License and BSD as well . He is poking fun at both camps, not gently at all. His page about the WTFPL is funny-because-it’s true hilarious, and I admit that I feel a sneaking temptation to start using it myself.
- Jump up^ Sam Hocevar (2015-09-21). “Should I change the name of the WTFPL?” . Programmers Stack Exchange (User comment) . Retrieved 2016-07-19 .
The WTFPL is a parody of the GPL, which has a similar copyright header and list of permissions to modify (ie none), see for instance gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html. The purpose of the WTFPL wording is to give more freedom to the GPL does.
- Jump up^ Nina Paley (2011-06-24). “How To Free Your Work” . QuestionCopyright.org . Retrieved 2016-07-19 .